Bittle v. City of Santa Monica
| INGRID BITTLE |
| CITY OF SANTA MONICA |
| 25-7884 |
| December 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MAIL RETURNED. DE 9 addressed to Appellant Ingrid Bittle. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 05/12/2026 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 10 MAIL RETURNED. DE 4, DE 8 addressed to Appellant Ingrid Bittle. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:54 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not timely filed the opening brief or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or proof that fees were paid to the district court, as ordered by this court on March 24, 2026. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. On March 16, 2026, the district court resolved the post-judgment motion. The stay of proceedings is therefore lifted and this appeal will proceed. The fees for this appeal are overdue. No later than April 13, 2026, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant does not do so, the court may dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Appellant must report any change of address to this court in writing as soon as possible. See 9th Cir. R. 46-3. The opening brief is due April 27, 2026. There is no appearance by appellee, so briefing will be complete when the opening brief is filed. The clerk will serve Form 4 on appellant. [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:38 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Ingrid Bittle. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 03/24/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 MAIL RETURNED. DE 3 addressed to Appellant Ingrid Bittle. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 03/17/2026 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 District Court Order/Notice Received. [Entered: 03/16/2026 01:24 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The district court entered a final dismissal order on November 6, 2025, and did not enter a separate judgment on the docket. On December 11, 2025, appellant filed the notice of appeal, which attaches a motion for reconsideration. Appellant refiled the motion for reconsideration in the district court on February 6, 2026. Proceedings in this court are stayed until the district court rules on the motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and the district judge. [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 2/11/2026 [Entered: 01/14/2026 10:23 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/26/2026. For appeal no. 25-7884, 2:25-cv-08128-WLH-JC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/16/2025 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-08128-WLH-JC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7884 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/16/2025 01:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bittle v. City of Santa Monica | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: INGRID BITTLE | |
| Represented By: | Ingrid Bittle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF SANTA MONICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
