Wolski v. City of Menlo Park, et al.
| PAUL WOLSKI, PhD |
| CITY OF MENLO PARK, DAVID NORRIS, Police Chief, MATTHEW PAGE, Police Officer, ID# 146399, MICHAEL DEPIRO, Police Officer, ID# 146408, NICHOLAS PAGE and DOMINIC DEPIRO |
| RODERICK & SOLANGE MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER |
| 25-7896 |
| December 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 18 by Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 19 ADDED Amicus Curiae Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center. [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 17 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Suzanne M. Nicholson [Entered: 05/08/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Suzanne M. Nicholson for Appellee City of Menlo Park, Appellee David Norris, Appellee Matthew Page, Appellee Michael DePiro. [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 18 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center.--[COURT ENTERED FILING to replace DE 14] [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:30 PM] |
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) to participate in oral argument is referred to the panel that decides the merits of this case. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 05/07/2026 05:04 PM]
|
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE --- AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center. (Incorrect entry, see DE 18) [Entered: 05/07/2026 09:07 AM] [Edited: 05/08/2026 03:31 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 12) granted FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/1/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:50 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee City of Menlo Park, Appellee David Norris, Appellee Matthew Page, Appellee Michael DePiro, Appellee Nicholas Page, Appellee Dominic Depiro. [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Paul Wolski is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/04/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Participate in Oral Argument filed by Appellant Paul Wolski. [Entered: 05/02/2026 12:04 AM] |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Paul Wolski.--[COURT UPDATE: Removed duplicate PDF of brief as of 5/4/2026] [Entered: 05/01/2026 11:58 PM] [Edited: 05/04/2026 02:51 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/1/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/1/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/25/2026 07:40 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Paul Wolski. [Entered: 03/24/2026 06:39 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Jacqueline H. NGUYEN The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for production of transcripts is denied as unnecessary. The opening brief is due April 1, 2026. The answering brief is due May 1, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 02/27/2026 09:40 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Paul Wolski. [Entered: 01/09/2026 07:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Paul Wolski.[COURT ENTERED-Filing from DE#3] [Entered: 12/19/2025 10:26 AM] [Edited: 12/19/2025 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Paul Wolski.[Filed under wrong event. Correct entry#4] [Entered: 12/18/2025 06:05 PM] [Edited: 12/19/2025 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/8/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 1/28/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/29/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/9/2026. For appeal no. 25-7896, 3:25-cv-01371-CRB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/16/2025 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-01371-CRB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7896 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/16/2025 04:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.