Litvinova, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco
Plaintiff: TATYANA LITVINOVA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Intervenor: KRISTEN SILLOWAY, CHRISTA DURAN and BRIGGITTA VAN EWIJK
Case Number: 25-7911
Filed: December 17, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2026 Filing 17 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 29, 2026. The answering brief is due July 29, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 05/04/2026 07:49 AM]
April 23, 2026 Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief (DE 15) filed by Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 04/23/2026 11:19 AM]
April 21, 2026 Filing 14 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:02 AM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 15 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Tatyana Litvinova. [Court entered filing to correct DE 13] [Entered: 04/21/2026 10:02 AM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENT to Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) filed by Appellant Tatyana Litvinova. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 15] [Entered: 04/17/2026 04:10 PM] [Edited: 04/21/2026 10:03 AM]
April 1, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/1/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/1/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/01/2026 12:40 PM]
March 31, 2026 Filing 11 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Tatyana Litvinova. [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:07 PM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/1/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/1/2026, Optional reply brief due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/04/2026 03:01 PM]
February 17, 2026 Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 3/4/2026, 2:00 PM Pacific Time (originally 2/16/2026). Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. [Entered: 02/17/2026 04:22 PM]
January 15, 2026 Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 2/16/2026, 2:00 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/18/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/17/2026, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/15/2026 04:29 PM]
January 12, 2026 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Spencer John Wilson [Entered: 01/12/2026 01:45 PM]
January 12, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Spencer John Wilson for Appellee City and County of San Francisco. [Entered: 01/12/2026 09:15 AM]
December 29, 2025 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 1/15/2026, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 12/29/2025 11:29 AM]
December 23, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Tatyana Litvinova. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 12/23/2025 02:44 PM]
December 23, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/29/2025. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:50 AM]
December 17, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/22/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/26/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/25/2026. For appeal no. 25-7911, 3:18-cv-01494-RS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/17/2025 01:56 PM]
December 17, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:18-cv-01494-RS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7911 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/17/2025 01:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Litvinova, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TATYANA LITVINOVA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Eduardo Gregory Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: KRISTEN SILLOWAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: CHRISTA DURAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: BRIGGITTA VAN EWIJK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Represented By: Linda Margaret Ross
Represented By: Spencer John Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?