Smythe v. OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: JAMES F. SMYTHE, a Delaware limited partnership
Defendant: OPENAI, INC., a Delaware Corporation, SAM ALTMAN, in his individual capacity and in his representative capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Open AI, INC, and Open AI, L.P., DANIEL MCCUSKER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a former FOIA agent and or representative of the United States Department of Education, JASON S. BOOKSTABER, PAUL M. NAKASONE, in his individual capacity, in his official capacity as former Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service and in his representative capacity as a member of the board of directors of OpenAI, In and OPENAI, LP
Case Number: 25-7980
Filed: December 19, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2026 Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion for Attorneys Fees (DE 23) filed by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone. [Entered: 04/09/2026 02:55 PM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 23 MOTION for Attorneys Fees filed by Appellant James F. Smythe. [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:37 PM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 22 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellant James F. Smythe is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/25/2026 01:42 PM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 21 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James F. Smythe. [Entered: 03/25/2026 12:46 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 20 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 13, DE 14 by Appellees are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:30 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 19 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP.--[Duplicate entry, correct entry is DE 14] [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:26 PM] [Edited: 03/23/2026 04:29 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 18 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP.--[Duplicate entry, correct entry is DE 14] [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:24 PM] [Edited: 03/23/2026 04:28 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 17 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP.--[Duplicate entry, correct entry is DE 14] [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:21 PM] [Edited: 03/23/2026 04:28 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 16 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP.--[Duplicate entry, correct entry is DE 14] [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:17 PM] [Edited: 03/23/2026 04:27 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 15 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP.--[Duplicate entry, correct entry is DE 14] [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:15 PM] [Edited: 03/23/2026 04:27 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 14 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached Vols 1-5] [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:14 PM] [Edited: 03/23/2026 04:26 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 13 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee OpenAI, Inc., Appellee Sam Altman, Appellee Daniel McCusker, Appellee Jason S. Bookstaber, Appellee Paul M. Nakasone, Appellee OpenAI, LP. [Entered: 03/23/2026 02:37 PM]
February 20, 2026 Filing 12 CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant James F. Smythe is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/20/2026 04:39 PM]
February 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) file a supplement brief is granted. The clerk will file the supplemental brief at Docket Entry No. 9. The answering brief is now due March 23, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 02/20/2026 04:12 PM]
February 20, 2026 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee OpenAI, Inc.. [Entered: 02/20/2026 10:47 AM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James F. Smythe.--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 8] [Entered: 02/05/2026 04:40 PM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION to File Supplemental Brief filed by Appellant James F. Smythe.--[COURT UPDATE: Removed brief and appendix (resubmitted at DE 9)] [Entered: 02/05/2026 03:09 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2026 04:41 PM]
January 8, 2026 Filing 7 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 and Excerpts of Record at DE 4 by Appellant James F. Smythe are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 01/08/2026 12:18 PM]
January 8, 2026 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant James F. Smythe. [Entered: 01/08/2026 10:18 AM]
January 8, 2026 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant James F. Smythe. [Entered: 01/08/2026 10:13 AM]
January 8, 2026 Filing 4 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant James F. Smythe. [Entered: 01/08/2026 09:20 AM]
January 7, 2026 Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James F. Smythe. [Entered: 01/07/2026 12:06 PM]
December 19, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 1/28/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 2/27/2026. For appeal no. 25-7980, 3:25-cv-08296-TLT. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/19/2025 04:12 PM]
December 19, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-08296-TLT has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-7980 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/19/2025 04:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Smythe v. OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES F. SMYTHE, a Delaware limited partnership
Represented By: James F. Smythe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OPENAI, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin D. Margo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAM ALTMAN, in his individual capacity and in his representative capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Open AI, INC, and Open AI, L.P.
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin D. Margo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANIEL MCCUSKER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a former FOIA agent and or representative of the United States Department of Education
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin D. Margo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JASON S. BOOKSTABER
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin D. Margo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL M. NAKASONE, in his individual capacity, in his official capacity as former Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service and in his representative capacity as a member of the board of directors of OpenAI, In
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin D. Margo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OPENAI, LP
Represented By: Mr. Benjamin D. Margo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?