Morrison v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno
| NICHOLAS MORRISON |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO |
| TUOLUMNE COUNTY SHERIFF |
| 25-8005 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. The district court may consider appointing pro bono counsel for Genevieve Morrison. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 01/28/2026 04:08 PM] [Edited: 01/28/2026 04:10 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 01/22/2026 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 11 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 01/22/2026 02:39 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Court entered filing to correct DE 9.] [Entered: 01/12/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE - Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 10.] [Entered: 01/12/2026 03:25 AM] [Edited: 01/12/2026 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Expedite (DE 7) filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 01/09/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Expedite filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Court entered filing, PDF from DE 6] [Entered: 01/02/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 01/01/2026 06:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 12/31/2025 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 12/31/2025 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 12/22/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/22/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8005 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 12/22/2025 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Nicholas Morrison. [Entered: 12/22/2025 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Morrison v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Fresno | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NICHOLAS MORRISON | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Morrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: TUOLUMNE COUNTY SHERIFF | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Tami M. Krenzin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
