Liem v. Chong Hing Bank Limited, et al.
| KEN LIEM |
| CHONG HING BANK LIMITED, DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED, FUBON BANK LIMITED, RICHOU TRADE LIMITED, FFQI TRADE LIMITED, XIBING LIMITED and WEIDEL LIMITED |
| 25-8020 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Jacqueline H. NGUYEN. The judgment of this Court, entered 3/3/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 03/25/2026 08:40 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Jacqueline H. NGUYEN) The court has received the responses to the December 23, 2025 order. The court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, because an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order, see Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order), and because the district court has not finally resolved the claims against the unserved defendants, see Disabled Rts. Action Comm. v. Las Vegas Events, Inc., 375 F.3d 861, 87172 (9th Cir. 2004) (Even where a complaint has been dismissed as to all the served defendants finality is lacking where no final judgment is entered and it is clear from the course of proceedings that further adjudication is contemplated.). DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/03/2026 01:25 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Attorney Hadjar Anahita Ohadi as Counsel for Appellant substituted for Attorney Keren E. Gesund, Lauren Michelle Sharon. [Entered: 02/11/2026 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hadjar Anahita Ohadi for Appellant Ken Liem replacing Keren E. Gesund, Lauren Michelle Sharon. [Entered: 02/11/2026 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 and Excerpts of Record at DE 12 by Appellant Ken Liem are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Ken Liem. [Entered: 02/03/2026 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ken Liem. [Entered: 02/03/2026 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Lauren Michelle Sharon [Entered: 02/03/2026 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lauren Michelle Sharon for Appellant Ken Liem. [Entered: 02/02/2026 06:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 5) filed by Appellee DBS Group Holdings Limited. [Entered: 01/26/2026 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee David Ryan Carpenter [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Ryan Carpenter for Appellee DBS Group Holdings Limited. [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellant Ken Liem. [Entered: 01/14/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER (text only). Counsel may contact the Circuit Mediation Office at [email protected] to discuss services available through the Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 12/31/2025 10:38 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A district courts order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a statement, appellees may file responses within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 12/23/2025 11:19 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/2/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/2/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/29/2025. For appeal no. 25-8020, 8:24-cv-02819-JVS-KES. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/22/2025 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:24-cv-02819-JVS-KES has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8020 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/22/2025 04:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
