Richards v. Remington, et al.
| VICTORIA RICHARDS, Special Administrator for the estate of Richard Lee Richards |
| RYAN REMINGTON and CITY OF TUCSON |
| 25-8133 |
| December 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 20) filed by Appellee Victoria Richards. [Entered: 05/27/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 19) filed by Appellant Ryan Remington. [Entered: 05/20/2026 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Victoria Richards. [Entered: 05/11/2026 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 18 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 12, DE 13 by Appellant Ryan Remington are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/21/2026 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Appellant Ryan Remington. [Entered: 04/20/2026 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Remington.--[duplicate entry, correct entry at DE 13] [Entered: 04/20/2026 10:57 AM] [Edited: 04/21/2026 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Remington.--[duplicate entry, correct entry at DE 12] [Entered: 04/20/2026 10:55 AM] [Edited: 04/21/2026 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE - MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Appellant Ryan Remington. [COURT UPDATE: corrected version at DE 17] [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:34 PM] [Edited: 05/19/2026 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 13 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Remington.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 4/21/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:33 PM] [Edited: 04/21/2026 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Remington.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 4/21/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:30 PM] [Edited: 04/21/2026 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Randal Richard Resch [Entered: 03/18/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Jacob Stroup [Entered: 03/18/2026 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Randal Richard Resch for Appellee Victoria Richards. [Entered: 03/18/2026 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jacob Stroup for Appellee Victoria Richards. [Entered: 03/18/2026 09:36 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/18/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/16/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/03/2026 01:19 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Ryan Remington. [Entered: 03/03/2026 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/3/2026, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/05/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Ryan Remington. [COURT UPDATE: Attached flattened PDF of mediation questionnaire.] To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/05/2026 09:40 AM] [Edited: 01/05/2026 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/17/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/16/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/5/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/6/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/5/2026. For appeal no. 25-8133, 4:22-cv-00429-JGZ. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/30/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:22-cv-00429-JGZ has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8133 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/30/2025 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
