Foshee v. United States of America, et al.
Plaintiff: RICHARD CLINTON FOSHEE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and AHMAD SHAFIQ HAIDARY
Case Number: 25-8149
Filed: December 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. On March 25, 2026, the district court resolved the post-judgment motion. The stay of proceedings is therefore lifted and this appeal will proceed. The opening brief is due June 29, 2026. The answering brief is due July 29, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 05/27/2026 09:55 AM]
February 3, 2026 Filing 7 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 02/03/2026 11:17 AM]
January 13, 2026 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/3/2026, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/13/2026 12:13 PM]
January 12, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Richard Clinton Foshee. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/12/2026 04:15 PM]
January 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Proceedings in this court other than mediation are stayed until the district court rules on the timely tolling motion filed on November 21, 2025. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and the district judge. [Entered: 01/08/2026 04:02 PM]
January 6, 2026 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/12/2026. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:43 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/5/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/6/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/5/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/17/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/16/2026. For appeal no. 25-8149, 8:23-cv-00375-ODW-JDE. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/31/2025 10:24 AM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:23-cv-00375-ODW-JDE has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8149 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/31/2025 10:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Foshee v. United States of America, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD CLINTON FOSHEE
Represented By: Joseph Thomas Sobecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Pauline Alarcon
Represented By: Jasmin Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AHMAD SHAFIQ HAIDARY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?