Mullin v. City of Mountain View, et al.
| TYGHE JAMES MULLIN |
| CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, RAYMOND CLUTTER, Police Detective, FRANK EDWARDS, Police Officer, RICKY VALENZUELA, Police Sergeant, DANIEL MILLER, Officer, KEVIN GALLOWAY, Officer and ED HAMMON, Officer |
| 25-8155 |
| December 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not filed a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, as ordered by this court on February 26, 2026. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:54 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:35 AM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Tyghe James Mullin. [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Tyghe James Mullin. [Entered: 02/19/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/11/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/9/2026. For appeal no. 25-8155, 5:25-cv-02191-BLF. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/31/2025 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:25-cv-02191-BLF has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8155 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/31/2025 12:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
