United States of America v. Parias
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CARLITOS RICARDO PARIAS
Case Number: 25-8156
Filed: December 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2026 Filing 22 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Amy E. Pomerantz. [Entered: 06/18/2026 08:11 PM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 21 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Alexander Botoman. [Entered: 06/17/2026 03:39 PM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 20 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for October 2026 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [25-8156] [Entered: 06/17/2026 11:46 AM]
May 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 16) to expedite is granted. The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief is due August 31, 2026. The optional reply brief is due September 21, 2026. No streamlined extensions of time to file a brief will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(1). No written motions for extensions of time under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b) will be granted absent extraordinary and compelling circumstances. This case will be placed on the next available calendar following the completion of briefing. [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:08 AM]
May 11, 2026 Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion to Expedite (DE 17) filed by Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:08 PM]
May 8, 2026 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion to Expedite (DE 16) filed by Appellee Carlitos Ricardo Parias. [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:01 PM]
May 4, 2026 Filing 16 MOTION to Expedite filed by Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 05/04/2026 12:25 PM]
May 1, 2026 Filing 15 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 13 by Appellant United States of America are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/01/2026 11:09 AM]
April 29, 2026 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 04/29/2026 04:00 PM]
April 29, 2026 Filing 13 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:41 PM]
April 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 30, 2026. The answering brief is due June 1, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:22 AM]
April 16, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 04/16/2026 03:34 PM]
March 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/23/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/25/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/03/2026 04:23 PM]
March 3, 2026 Filing 9 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 03/03/2026 12:23 PM]
January 20, 2026 Filing 8 Attorney Alexander Botoman as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Gabriela C. Rivera, Cuauhtemoc Ortega. [Entered: 01/20/2026 08:40 AM]
January 16, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Botoman for Appellee Carlitos Ricardo Parias replacing Gabriela C. Rivera, Cuauhtemoc Ortega. [Entered: 01/16/2026 07:16 PM]
January 9, 2026 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Amy E. Pomerantz [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:24 PM]
January 9, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Amy E. Pomerantz for Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 01/09/2026 12:26 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A. [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:58 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A. for Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:30 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: Discharged. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/13/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/12/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/24/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/23/2026. For appeal no. 25-8156, 2:25-cr-00904-FMO-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 12/31/2025 12:12 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cr-00904-FMO-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8156 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Parias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Chris Jones
Represented By: Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A., Appellate Criminal Chief
Represented By: Ms. Amy E. Pomerantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARLITOS RICARDO PARIAS
Represented By: Mr. Cuauhtemoc Ortega
Represented By: Ms. Gabriela C. Rivera
Represented By: Alexander Botoman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?