United States of America v. Parias
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CARLITOS RICARDO PARIAS
Case Number: 25-8156
Filed: December 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2026 Filing 8 Attorney Alexander Botoman as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Gabriela C. Rivera, Cuauhtemoc Ortega. [Entered: 01/20/2026 08:40 AM]
January 16, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Botoman for Appellee Carlitos Ricardo Parias replacing Gabriela C. Rivera, Cuauhtemoc Ortega. [Entered: 01/16/2026 07:16 PM]
January 9, 2026 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Amy E. Pomerantz [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:24 PM]
January 9, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Amy E. Pomerantz for Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 01/09/2026 12:26 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A. [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:58 PM]
January 5, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A. for Appellant United States of America. [Entered: 01/05/2026 04:30 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: Discharged. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/13/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/12/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/24/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/23/2026. For appeal no. 25-8156, 2:25-cr-00904-FMO-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 12/31/2025 12:12 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cr-00904-FMO-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8156 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/31/2025 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Parias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Chris Jones
Represented By: Criminal Appeals USAO C.D.C.A., Appellate Criminal Chief
Represented By: Ms. Amy E. Pomerantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARLITOS RICARDO PARIAS
Represented By: Mr. Cuauhtemoc Ortega
Represented By: Ms. Gabriela C. Rivera
Represented By: Alexander Botoman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?