Khan v. Kraemer, et al.
Plaintiff: SHAHERYAR KHAN
Defendant: ADAM KRAEMER, KENT SEATON, GOOGLE INC., APPLE INC., ESPN, INC., EVERLY WELL, INC., MARK BRANDT, MARGE WILSON, ROIBLY NEIGHBOR, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., STANFORD UNIVERSITY and UNKNOWN PARTIES
Case Number: 25-8161
Filed: December 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Court Order filed by Appellant Shaheryar Khan. [25-5155, 25-8161] [Entered: 06/01/2026 01:56 PM]
March 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. The motion (No. 25-5155 Docket Entry No. 14, 25-8161 Docket Entry No. 4) for an extension of time to respond to the November 24, 2025 order is granted. Appellants response is due May 25, 2026. Further motions for extension of time will be disfavored. Briefing remains stayed. [25-5155, 25-8161] [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:39 PM]
February 23, 2026 Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Court Order filed by Appellant Shaheryar Khan. [25-5155, 25-8161] [Entered: 02/24/2026 08:50 AM]
January 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. The court consolidates appeal Nos. 25-5155 and 25-8161. The court grants an extension of time to respond to the November 24, 2025 order entered in appeal No. 25-5155. On or before February 20, 2026, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the consolidated appeals are not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeals, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the consolidated appeals are not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeals are frivolous. If they are frivolous, the appeals will be dismissed. If they are not frivolous, the appeals will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeals should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss the consolidated appeals without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [25-5155, 25-8161] [Entered: 01/06/2026 02:13 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/11/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/9/2026. For appeal no. 25-8161, 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [COURT UPDATE: resending NDA to include pro se appellant] [Entered: 12/31/2025 02:04 PM] [Edited: 01/02/2026 01:58 PM]
December 31, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8161 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/31/2025 02:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Khan v. Kraemer, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHAHERYAR KHAN
Represented By: Shaheryar Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADAM KRAEMER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KENT SEATON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GOOGLE INC.
Represented By: Alisha C. Burgin
Represented By: Ms. Sunita Bali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ESPN, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EVERLY WELL, INC.
Represented By: Ms. Katherine Marie Peaslee
Represented By: Krysta Kauble Pachman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK BRANDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARGE WILSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROIBLY NEIGHBOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STANFORD UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?