Reinbold v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., et al.
| LORA H. REINBOLD |
| ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., KYLE LEVINE, KIM HUTCHINSON, JEREMY HORN, DIANE BIRKETT RAKOW, MARILYN ROMANO, M. FRIAS, AMBER ALLEN, ALISON REINECCIUS, TROY MICHAEL WUYTS SMITH, JOHN ROSS MANN, KRISTEN DILLEY, BRENDA BAYNARD, DOROTHY DANIELS, TIM THOMPSON and LAUREL CARMICHAEL |
| 25-901 |
| February 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| REINBOLD V. ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/23/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/31/2025 02:12 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Alaska Airlines, Inc., Appellee Marilyn Romano, Appellee Amber Allen, Appellee Alison Reineccius, Appellee Troy Michael Wuyts Smith, Appellee John Ross Mann, Appellee Kristen Dilley, Appellee Brenda Baynard, Appellee Dorothy Daniels. [Entered: 03/31/2025 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard G. Grotch for Appellee Alaska Airlines, Inc., Appellee Alison Reineccius, Appellee Amber Allen, Appellee Brenda Baynard, Appellee Diane Birkett Rakow, Appellee Dorothy Daniels, Appellee Jeremy Horn, Appellee John Ross Mann, Appellee Kristen Dilley, Appellee Kyle Levine, Appellee Laurel Carmichael, Appellee M. Frias, Appellee Marilyn Romano, Appellee Tim Thompson, Appellee Troy Michael Wuyts Smith. [Entered: 03/30/2025 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 and Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Lora H. Reinbold are filed. [Entered: 03/27/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Lora H. Reinbold. [Entered: 03/27/2025 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Lora H. Reinbold. [Entered: 03/27/2025 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/23/2025. For appeal no. 25-901, 3:23-cv-00087-MMS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/11/2025 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-00087-MMS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-901 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/11/2025 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
