Talkdesk, Inc. v. Pham
| TALKDESK, INC., a Delaware corporation |
| ANDREW PHAM, an individual |
| 25-948 |
| February 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TALKDESK, INC. V. PHAMLos Angeles, Central CaliforniaCivilRawlinson, Johnnie B., Sanchez, Gabriel P., Fitzwater, Sidney A. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/5/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/7/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/03/2025 07:41 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Andrew Pham. [Entered: 04/02/2025 11:16 PM] |
| Filing 11 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 03/04/2025 08:14 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Andrew Pham. [Entered: 02/27/2025 07:59 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Talkdesk, Inc.. [Entered: 02/27/2025 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER: By 3/5/2025, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 02/19/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Andrew Pham. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/17/2025 11:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Katherine Munyan [Entered: 02/14/2025 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Christopher J. Cariello [Entered: 02/14/2025 07:59 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Katherine Munyan for Appellee Talkdesk, Inc.. [Entered: 02/14/2025 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher J. Cariello for Appellee Talkdesk, Inc.. [Entered: 02/14/2025 07:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/18/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 2/25/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 3/27/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/6/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/5/2025. For appeal no. 25-948, 2:22-cv-05961-MCS-JPR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/13/2025 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-05961-MCS-JPR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-948 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/13/2025 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Talkdesk, Inc. v. Pham | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TALKDESK, INC., a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Munyan |
| Represented By: | Mr. Christopher J. Cariello |
| Represented By: | Amy Van Zant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW PHAM, an individual | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Stephen M. Lobbin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
