United States of America v. Sui
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| YAN SUI |
| 25-982 |
| February 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the transcript is denied as unnecessary. Pursuant to the courts March 5, 2025, order, the transcripts are due April 30, 2025. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. The clerk will serve this order on the court reporter Suzanne M. McKennon at the district court. [Entered: 03/28/2025 03:34 PM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Transcript filed by court reporter . [Entered: 03/25/2025 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 16 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Party has counsel] [Entered: 03/11/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 15 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Benjamin Lee Coleman [Entered: 03/06/2025 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 14 CJA Counsel Appointment [Entered: 03/06/2025 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 13 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Deborah Elise Gonzalez, representing Appellant Yan Sui. [Entered: 03/05/2025 04:58 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) by the Office of the Federal Public Defender to withdraw and to appoint new counsel is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Within 14 days of identifying counsel, the appointing authority for the Central District of California is requested to send counsels contact information to [email protected]. Counsel must order the transcript by March 31, 2025. The transcript is due April 30, 2025. The opening brief is due June 11, 2025. The answering brief is due July 11, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is represented by counsel, the court will take no action on appellants pro se filings (Docket Entry Nos. 7, 8 & 9). The clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually. [Entered: 03/05/2025 04:01 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Withdraw and for Appointment of New Counsel filed by Appellant Yan Sui. [Entered: 02/28/2025 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 10 CJA FORM 23 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Appellant Yan Sui. [Entered: 02/28/2025 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Strike Filing or Portion of Filing filed by Appellant Yan Sui. [Has counsel] [Entered: 02/26/2025 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed Pro Se filed by Appellant Yan Sui. [Court edit to attach additional PDF] [Entered: 02/26/2025 10:57 AM] [Edited: 02/26/2025 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 7 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Has counsel] [Entered: 02/26/2025 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 6 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 02/21/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Criminal Appeals Questionnaire filed by Appellant Yan Sui [Entered: 02/19/2025 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Deborah Elise Gonzalez as Counsel for Appellant substituted for Attorney Gabriela C. Rivera. [Entered: 02/19/2025 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Deborah Elise Gonzalez for Appellant Yan Sui replacing Gabriela C. Rivera. [Entered: 02/19/2025 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: [12 Months]. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 2/26/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 3/28/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/7/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/6/2025. For appeal no. 25-982, 2:24-cr-00498-JAK-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/14/2025 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cr-00498-JAK-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-982 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/14/2025 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Sui | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David Ransom Friedman |
| Represented By: | Matt Coe-Odess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: YAN SUI | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Gabriela C. Rivera |
| Represented By: | Deborah Elise Gonzalez |
| Represented By: | Mr. Benjamin Lee Coleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
