Felix-Garcia v. Blanche
| VICTOR ALFON FELIX-GARCIA |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-1039 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/06/2026 07:12 AM] |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 6) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 04/02/2026 04:35 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry Nos. 3, 4) are granted. The certified administrative record remains due April 6, 2026. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due April 27, 2026. The opening brief is due May 14, 2026. The answering brief is due June 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:04 PM]
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebekah Nahas for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/24/2026 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Rebekah Nahas [Entered: 02/23/2026 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebekah Nahas for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 4/27/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 5/14/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 6/15/2026, Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 4/6/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 7 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/21/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1039 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 1/22/2026. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
