Felix-Garcia v. Blanche
| VICTOR ALFON FELIX-GARCIA |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-1039 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for November 2026 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/cases/calendar. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 08/03/2026 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 27 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 26 by Respondent Todd Blanche is filed. No paper copies are required. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 07/16/2026 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 26 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Todd Blanche. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 07/16/2026 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 25 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Todd Blanche. [26-1039, 25-7278]--[Duplicate entry, correct DE is 24 in 25-7278] [Entered: 07/16/2026 07:53 AM] [Edited: 07/16/2026 08:41 AM] |
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 22) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 23) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Consolidated Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 7/20/2026. Optional Consolidated Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Consolidated Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 06/09/2026 03:14 PM]
|
| Filing 23 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Respondent Todd Blanche. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 06/09/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 22 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 19 by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia is filed. No paper copies are required. [26-1039, 25-7278] [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 21 CLERK ACTION: submitted at by is filed. No paper copies are required. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:44 PM] |
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 18) to consolidate is granted. Nos. 25-7278 and 26-1039 are consolidated. The parties must include both case numbers on all future filings. The motion (Docket Entry Nos. 16 in No. 25-7278) to accept the opening brief late in No. 25-7278 is granted. The clerk will file the opening brief at Docket Entry No. 17 in No. 25-7278. The clerk will file the opening brief at Docket Entry No. 19 in No. 26-1039. The consolidated answering brief is now due June 18, 2026. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after the consolidated answering brief is served. [25-7278, 26-1039] [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:20 PM]
|
| Filing 19 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 05/14/2026 07:21 PM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia.--[Duplicate entry, correct DE is 19] [Entered: 05/14/2026 07:17 PM] [Edited: 05/15/2026 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia.--[Duplicate entry, correct DE is 19] [Entered: 05/14/2026 07:15 PM] [Edited: 05/15/2026 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Consolidate filed by Respondent Todd Blanche. [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 15 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/06/2026 07:12 AM] |
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 6) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 04/02/2026 04:35 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motions to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry Nos. 3, 4) are granted. The certified administrative record remains due April 6, 2026. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due April 27, 2026. The opening brief is due May 14, 2026. The answering brief is due June 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:04 PM]
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebekah Nahas for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/24/2026 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Rebekah Nahas [Entered: 02/23/2026 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebekah Nahas for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 4/27/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 5/14/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 6/15/2026, Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 4/6/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 7 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/21/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1039 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 1/22/2026. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Victor Alfon Felix-Garcia. [Entered: 02/23/2026 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
