Moreno Valdivia, et al. v. Blanche
| JESSICA KATHERINNE MORENO VALDIVIA, DAJHANA JAMILE MARQUEZ MORENO, MIA NATHANIEL MARQUEZ MORENO and CARLOS MATEO RONDON MORENO |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-1052 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 13 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/06/2026 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion to Accept Late Filing (DE 8) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Court entered filing, PDF from DE 9] [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:28 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioners must pay a $600 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioners do not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioners. [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:28 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/26/2026 06:52 AM] |
| Filing 9 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/26/2026 06:50 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Lindsay Corliss [Entered: 02/24/2026 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsay Corliss for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/24/2026 07:45 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Accept Late Filing filed by Petitioner Jessica Katherinne Moreno Valdivia. [Entered: 02/24/2026 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 4/6/2026, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 4/27/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 5/14/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 6/15/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/23/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1052 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Carlos Mateo Rondon Moreno, Petitioner Dajhana Jamile Marquez Moreno, Petitioner Jessica Katherinne Moreno Valdivia, Petitioner Mia Nathaniel Marquez Moreno. [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.