Price v. Sherman, et al.
Plaintiff: EDMOND PAUL PRICE
Defendant: STU SHERMAN, ALVARADO, CARIVAO and MARTINEZ
Case Number: 26-1066
Filed: February 24, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Appellants response to this courts February 26, 2026 order attests that appellant delivered the notice of appeal to prison authorities for forwarding to the district court on January 14, 2026, within 30 days after the district court entered judgment on January 9, 2026. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c)(1). Appellees have not filed a response. The February 26, 2026 order is discharged. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. Appellant must file the transcript order form with the district court on or before May 13, 2026. The transcripts are due June 12, 2026. The opening brief is now due July 22, 2026. The answering brief is due August 21, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/15/2026 11:34 AM]
March 24, 2026 Filing 6 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellant Edmond Paul Price. [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:59 AM]
March 10, 2026 Filing 5 Attorney Jaime Ganson as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney David Edward Kuchinsky, Jennifer Burns. [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:53 AM]
March 10, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jaime Ganson for Appellee Alvarado, Appellee Carivao, Appellee Martinez replacing . [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:43 AM]
February 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Appellants notice of appeal was dated January 14, 2026, and the district court received the notice of appeal on February 17, 2026, more than 30 days after the district court entered judgment on January 9, 2026. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). The court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional); see also Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (a)(6); 26(b)(1) (only the district court can extend the time to file a notice of appeal). The notice of appeal did not include a proof of service. A pro se prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal legal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days, appellant must file a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions legal mail system and whether first-class postage was prepaid. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a declaration or statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 33 Inmate Declaration of Timely Filing on appellant. [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:54 PM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/11/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/3/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/12/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/2/2026. For appeal no. 26-1066, 1:20-cv-00131-JLT-EPG. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:18 AM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:20-cv-00131-JLT-EPG has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1066 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/24/2026 09:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Price v. Sherman, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDMOND PAUL PRICE
Represented By: Edmond Paul Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STU SHERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALVARADO
Represented By: Jennifer Burns
Represented By: David Edward Kuchinsky
Represented By: Jaime Ganson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARIVAO
Represented By: Jennifer Burns
Represented By: David Edward Kuchinsky
Represented By: Jaime Ganson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARTINEZ
Represented By: Jennifer Burns
Represented By: David Edward Kuchinsky
Represented By: Jaime Ganson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?