Hurst-Castl v. Sables, LLC
| TRACY LEE HURST-CASTL |
| SABLES, LLC |
| 26-115 |
| January 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 20) for an extension of time to file the optional reply brief is denied as unnecessary. The reply brief has been filed. Briefing is complete. [Entered: 06/01/2026 11:25 AM]
|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE to Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (DE 20) filed by Appellee Sables, LLC. [Entered: 05/22/2026 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 22 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 21 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 05/18/2026 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 19 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 15, DE 16 by Appellee Sables, LLC are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/23/2026 10:37 AM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. BENNETT and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. The renewed motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for a stay pending appeal and for injunctive relief is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009) (defining standard in the context of staying lower court order or judgment); Feldman v. Ariz. Secy of State, 843 F.3d 366, 367 (9th Cir. 2016) (The standard for evaluating an injunction pending appeal is similar to that employed by district courts in deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction.); see also Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008) (defining standard for preliminary injunction in district court). The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for leave to file a supplemental brief is referred to the panel that considers the merits of this appeal. The opening brief has been filed. The clerk will file the answering brief at Docket Entry No. 15. The optional reply brief is due May 18, 2026. [Entered: 04/23/2026 10:09 AM]
|
| Filing 17 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Sables, LLC. [Entered: 04/20/2026 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 16 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Sables, LLC. [Entered: 04/17/2026 10:30 PM] |
| Filing 15 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Sables, LLC. [Entered: 04/17/2026 10:26 PM] |
| Filing 14 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to File Supplemental Brief filed by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:29 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/17/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:34 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Sables, LLC. [Entered: 03/16/2026 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 02/10/2026 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 02/10/2026 10:59 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. M. SMITH and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. The emergency motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for a stay is denied. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 02/09/2026 04:38 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl.--[Court Update: Correct PDF attached as of 2/6/2026] [Entered: 02/06/2026 08:55 AM] [Edited: 02/06/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl. [Entered: 02/06/2026 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/17/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/18/2026. For appeal no. 26-115, 2:25-cv-00752-APG-NJK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/07/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00752-APG-NJK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-115 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/07/2026 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hurst-Castl v. Sables, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TRACY LEE HURST-CASTL | |
| Represented By: | Tracy Lee Hurst-Castl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SABLES, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Madeleine Coles |
| Represented By: | Alayne M. Opie |
| Represented By: | Michael Hogue |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
