Graham v. Bean, et al.
| SANKONA GRAHAM |
| JEREMY BEAN, RODOLPHO VALLE, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PEARSE, BRANDON SILBER, WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC., UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Inmate #1203799, KION PHYLOW, MARK BRAY, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Concrete Allure, BOSKOVICH LAW GROUP, PLLC, WORTHY PEOPLE, INC., EDOVO, LTD., JAKING MATEUSEK, FLOYD MOORE, SUZAN MUCANO, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Project "Patrick" Pat, JERNARD GRAHAM and KION DUNLAP |
| 26-1187 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Sankona Graham. [Entered: 04/22/2026 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Sankona Graham. (case closed, sent appellant copy of docket sheet) [Entered: 04/21/2026 10:40 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) denied. This appeal is dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b). [Entered: 04/10/2026 11:31 AM]
|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY. The judgment of this Court, entered 3/19/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 04/10/2026 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 6 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Sankona Graham. [Entered: 04/10/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Sankona Graham. [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:56 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the February 2, 2026 order challenged in the notice of appeal is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/19/2026 01:47 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/13/2026. For appeal no. 26-1187, 2:25-cv-02612-CDS-MDC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/02/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-02612-CDS-MDC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1187 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/02/2026 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
