Harris v. Unknown Party
| ANDRE PIERRE HARRIS, Chief Minister Black Bear and Ra She Amon El A Hu Rayn |
| UNKNOWN PARTY, Great Nature |
| 26-1201 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - Arbitration |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Andre Pierre Harris. [Entered: 04/16/2026 02:23 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. The request to stay the 35-day deadline to respond to the March 20, 2026 order is denied. The response to that order remains due April 24, 2026. If appellant does not file a response to the March 20, 2026 order by April 24, 2026, the court will consider appellants March 24, 2026 filing and determine whether this appeal is frivolous, regardless of any further requests. [Entered: 03/30/2026 10:12 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Andre Pierre Harris. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 03/27/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 5) filed by Appellant Andre Pierre Harris. [Entered: 03/25/2026 01:58 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 03/20/2026 11:37 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Andre Pierre Harris. [Entered: 03/16/2026 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Andre Pierre Harris. [Entered: 03/16/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/13/2026. For appeal no. 26-1201, 2:25-cv-08225-RGK-JC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/02/2026 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-08225-RGK-JC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1201 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/02/2026 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
