Carlson, et al. v. City of Redmond
| SCOTT CARLSON, TYLER PARNELL, ALISON HALLIFAX, SHARON L. DAVIS, BRIAN ROBILLARD, JOSH FREI, MATTHEW PETERSON and ARTEM TETERIN |
| CITY OF REDMOND |
| 26-127 |
| January 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Scott Carlson, Appellant Tyler Parnell, Appellant Alison Hallifax, Appellant Sharon L. Davis, Appellant Brian Robillard, Appellant Josh Frei, Appellant Matthew Peterson, Appellant Artem Teterin. [Entered: 06/24/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Edward L. Pickup [Entered: 06/24/2026 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Simon A. Latcovich [Entered: 06/24/2026 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward L. Pickup for Appellant Alison Hallifax, Appellant Artem Teterin, Appellant Brian Robillard, Appellant Josh Frei, Appellant Matthew Peterson, Appellant Scott Carlson, Appellant Sharon L. Davis, Appellant Tyler Parnell. [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Simon A. Latcovich for Appellant Alison Hallifax, Appellant Artem Teterin, Appellant Brian Robillard, Appellant Josh Frei, Appellant Matthew Peterson, Appellant Scott Carlson, Appellant Sharon L. Davis, Appellant Tyler Parnell. [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:45 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) to coordinate briefing schedules and calendar appeal Nos. 26-127 and 26-3345 before the same panel to consider the merits of these appeals is granted. The request to consolidate briefing is denied and briefing in these cases will proceed separately. The request (included in Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 29, 2026. The answering brief is due August 28, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/03/2026 12:14 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Consolidate filed by Appellant Scott Carlson, Appellant Tyler Parnell, Appellant Alison Hallifax, Appellant Sharon L. Davis, Appellant Brian Robillard, Appellant Josh Frei, Appellant Matthew Peterson, Appellant Artem Teterin. [Entered: 05/26/2026 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 1, 2026. The answering brief is due July 1, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/03/2026 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Scott Carlson, Appellant Tyler Parnell, Appellant Alison Hallifax, Appellant Sharon L. Davis, Appellant Brian Robillard, Appellant Josh Frei, Appellant Matthew Peterson, Appellant Artem Teterin. [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 02/25/2026 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Mediation Appellant Status Report due (Appellant) 2/24/2026, Mediation Appellee Status Report due (Appellee) 2/24/2026 . See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/3/2026, 11:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/13/2026 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Scott Carlson, Appellant Tyler Parnell, Appellant Alison Hallifax, Appellant Sharon L. Davis, Appellant Brian Robillard, Appellant Josh Frei, Appellant Matthew Peterson, Appellant Artem Teterin. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/12/2026 07:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/30/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/12/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/17/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/20/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/29/2026. For appeal no. 26-127, 2:22-cv-01739-JNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/07/2026 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-01739-JNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-127 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/07/2026 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
