Martinez Rosales, et al. v. Blanche
Petitioner: PATRICIA ELIZABETH MARTINEZ ROSALES and MANUEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 26-1288
Filed: March 5, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2026 Filing 13 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/30/2026 03:41 AM]
April 22, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the certified administrative record is granted. The certified administrative record is due May 14, 2026. The response to the motion for a stay of removal is due June 4, 2026. The opening brief is due June 23, 2026. The answering brief is due July 23, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:39 PM]
April 14, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Certified Administrative Record filed by Respondent Todd Blanche. [Entered: 04/14/2026 10:25 AM]
April 8, 2026 Filing 10 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:28 PM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 9 Fee Paid by Patricia Elizabeth Martinez Rosales, Manuel Angel Rodriguez Martinez. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2609732-ACMS. [Entered: 03/19/2026 04:43 PM]
March 18, 2026 Filing 8 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due (Respondent) 5/6/2026 [Entered: 03/18/2026 08:04 AM]
March 17, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Patricia Elizabeth Martinez Rosales, Petitioner Manuel Angel Rodriguez Martinez. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile motion originally filed in DE 6.] [Entered: 03/18/2026 07:59 AM]
March 17, 2026 Filing 6 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Patricia Elizabeth Martinez Rosales, Petitioner Manuel Angel Rodriguez Martinez. [COURT UPDATE: Removed motion from certificate and refiled at DE 7.] [Entered: 03/17/2026 05:45 PM] [Edited: 03/18/2026 08:01 AM]
March 5, 2026 Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Enitan Otunla [Entered: 03/05/2026 11:07 AM]
March 5, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Enitan Otunla for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:57 AM]
March 5, 2026 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 4/14/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 5/26/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 6/23/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 03/05/2026 07:06 AM]
March 5, 2026 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/4/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1288 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/05/2026 07:03 AM]
March 4, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Manuel Angel Rodriguez Martinez, Petitioner Patricia Elizabeth Martinez Rosales. [Entered: 03/05/2026 07:02 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Martinez Rosales, et al. v. Blanche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PATRICIA ELIZABETH MARTINEZ ROSALES
Represented By: Mr. Michael John Selph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MANUEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ
Represented By: Mr. Michael John Selph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ms. Enitan Otunla
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Enitan Otunla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?