Towner v. A Place for Rover, Inc., et al.
| MARK E. TOWNER |
| A PLACE FOR ROVER, INC., CHRISTOPHER RANDALL COOK, AARON EASTERLY, JANIS COOK, BRENT TURNER, ST. BERNARD PARISH ANIMAL CONTROL, CHARLIE WICKERS, AMANDA FORDE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Office of General Counsel for United States Office of Personnel Management, BLACKSTONE, INC., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Office of General Counsel for United states Department of Health and Human Services and OFFICE OF MEDICARE HEARINGS AND APPEALS, Office of General Counsel for United States Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals |
| 26-1298 |
| March 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) to correct the excerpts of record is granted. The clerk will replace the table of contents in the excerpts of record at Docket Entry No. 4 with the corrected table of contents at Docket Entry No. 7.2. The answering briefs remain due May 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the last answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/10/2026 09:41 AM]
|
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee A Place for Rover, Inc., Appellee Blackstone, Inc.. [Entered: 03/20/2026 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant Mark E. Towner. [Entered: 03/15/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Mark E. Towner. [Entered: 03/13/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 3, DE 4 by Appellant Mark E. Towner are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 03/13/2026 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Mark E. Towner.--[Court entered filing, originally filed with brief at DE 3] [Entered: 03/13/2026 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Mark E. Towner.--[Court Update: Removed excerpts, filed correct at DE 4] [Entered: 03/12/2026 04:26 PM] [Edited: 03/13/2026 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/15/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/15/2026. For appeal no. 26-1298, 2:25-cv-00553-JNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/06/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00553-JNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1298 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/06/2026 03:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
