General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. RSUI Group, Inc., et al.
| REED HEIN & ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company doing business as Timeshare Exit Team, MAKAYMAX, INC., a Washington corporation and BRANDON REED |
| GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, a Wisconsin corporation, BRIAN ADOLPH and KERRI ADOLPH |
| RSUI GROUP, INC. and RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY, INC. |
| 26-1307 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This case is dismissed. This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 04/16/2026 09:27 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellant RSUI Group, Inc., Appellant RSUI Indemnity Company, Inc.. [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Court Order (DE 8) filed by Appellee Brian Adolph, Appellee Kerri Adolph. [Entered: 04/06/2026 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Order - Call for Response to Filing (DE 3) filed by Appellant RSUI Group, Inc., Appellant RSUI Indemnity Company, Inc.. [Entered: 03/27/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 03/23/2026 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 3/23/2026, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 03/16/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant RSUI Group, Inc., Appellant RSUI Indemnity Company, Inc.. [Entered: 03/10/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant RSUI Group, Inc., Appellant RSUI Indemnity Company, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/10/2026 03:53 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A district courts order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Additionally, a district courts order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) unless the district court [] expressly find[s] in writing that all three 1292(b) requirements are met. Couch v. Telescope Inc., 611 F.3d 629, 633 (9th Cir. 2010); see also 28 U.S.C. 1292(b); ICTSI Or., Inc. v. Intl Longshore & Warehouse Union, 22 F.4th 1125, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2022) (discussing the jurisdictional requirements for an appeal under 1292(b)). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellants must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellants do not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellants file a statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 03/06/2026 09:20 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/10/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/14/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/14/2026. For appeal no. 26-1307, 2:23-cv-00725-TMC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/05/2026 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00725-TMC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1307 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/05/2026 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
