Russell v. WADOT Capital, Inc., et al.
| PATRIC RUSSELL, Administrator and Successor of the ESTATE OF PETRA RUSSELL |
| WADOT CAPITAL, INC., a Washington Corporation, ERIK EGGER, NICOLE HOUSE, as WADOT Capital, Inc.'s governing persons, MICHAEL WHITE, STEVEN WHITE, HMJOINT, LLC, MICHELE CHAFFEE, LISA HALLMON, NCW TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, TODD LINDSTROM CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation doing business as Capital Compete, TODD LINDSTROM, as Todd Lindstrom Corporation's governing person, TIA LINDSTROM, NATIONAL CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., JARED EKDAHL and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 26-1325 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Petra Ambrose, representing Appellee NCW Trustee Services, LLC. [Entered: 08/26/2026 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Petra Ambrose. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 08/26/2026 11:37 AM] |
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 21) granted FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/30/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/21/2026 01:11 PM]
|
| Filing 21 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee WADOT Capital, Inc., Appellee Erik Egger, Appellee Nicole House, Appellee Michael White, Appellee Steven White, Appellee HMJOINT, LLC, Appellee Michele Chaffee, Appellee Lisa Hallmon. [Entered: 08/21/2026 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 20 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 18, DE 19 by Appellant Patric Russell are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/31/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 19 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Patric Russell. [Entered: 07/30/2026 07:45 PM] |
| Filing 18 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Patric Russell. [Entered: 07/30/2026 07:34 PM] |
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 15) to file an oversized opening brief is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 32-2; see also Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Rule 32-2 (In almost all cases, the limits provided suffice even for multiple or complex issues. Most overlength briefs could be shorter and unnecessarily burden the Court.). The motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time is granted. Appellant must submit a brief that complies with the length limits in Ninth Circuit Rule 32-1 by July 31, 2026. The answering briefs are due by August 31, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the last answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/29/2026 11:19 AM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Patric Russell.--[Court entered filing, originally filed at DE 15] [Entered: 06/26/2026 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION to File Oversized Brief filed by Appellant Patric Russell. [Entered: 06/25/2026 06:54 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 26, 2026. The answering briefs are due July 27, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the last answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/25/2026 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 06/25/2026 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Patric Russell. [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 15, 2026. The answering briefs are due July 15, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the last answering brief is served. [Entered: 05/14/2026 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Patric Russell. [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 9 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER: By 3/24/2026, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 03/12/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Nicole T. Morrow, representing Appellee NCW Trustee Services, LLC. [Entered: 03/11/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Nicole T. Morrow. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-].--[Court Update: Updated docket text] [Entered: 03/10/2026 04:22 PM] [Edited: 03/11/2026 08:57 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 4) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/15/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/14/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/10/2026 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Patric Russell. [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Patric Russell. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/14/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/10/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/14/2026. For appeal no. 26-1325, 2:22-cv-00531-JLR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/05/2026 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-00531-JLR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1325 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/05/2026 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.