Sivak v. Winmill
| LACEY SIVAK |
| BYRON LYNN WINMILL |
| 26-1357 |
| March 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. (John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY) This court has reviewed the February 17, 2026 notice of appeal and the district court record pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 23-80069. The appeal lacks sufficient merit to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 26-1357 is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. This order, served on the district court for the District of Idaho, constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/20/2026 01:55 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Lacey Sivak. [Entered: 03/18/2026 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 26-1357. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 23-80069, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 03/06/2026 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:26-cv-00041-AKB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1357 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/06/2026 03:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sivak v. Winmill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK | |
| Represented By: | Lacey Sivak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BYRON LYNN WINMILL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
