Tuma, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
| KENNETH STEVEN TUMA, SR. and DEBORAH ANN TUMA |
| COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
| 26-1363 |
| March 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Mark J. BENNETT, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 9 in No. 26-1363; Docket Entry No. 8 in No. 26-1368) to consolidate is granted. Appeal Nos. 26-1363 and 26-1368 are consolidated. The motions (Docket Entry No. 7 in No. 26-1363; Docket Entry No. 7 in No. 26-1368) for appointment of pro bono counsel are denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8 in No. 26-1363) for an extension of time to file a disclosure statement is unnecessary. Appellants are not required to file a disclosure statement. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8 in No. 26-1363) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The consolidated opening brief is due June 1, 2026. The consolidated answering brief is due July 1, 2026. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after the consolidated answering brief is served. Appellants are not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellants do not submit excerpts, appellee must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [26-1363, 26-1368] [Entered: 04/24/2026 10:21 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Consolidate filed by Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [Entered: 04/14/2026 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Kenneth Steven Tuma, Sr., Appellant Deborah Ann Tuma. [Entered: 04/13/2026 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Kenneth Steven Tuma, Sr., Appellant Deborah Ann Tuma. [Entered: 03/30/2026 05:25 PM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney Alexander Stevko as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Michael J. Haungs. [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Stevko for Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue replacing Michael J. Haungs. [Entered: 03/26/2026 07:34 AM] |
| Filing 4 TAX COURT RECORD filed by U.S. Tax Court. [Entered: 03/23/2026 05:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/18/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/20/2026. For appeal no. 26-1363, 18978-19. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 Tax Court Docket, Notice of Appeal, and Relevant Documents Transmitted from Tax Court to Court of Appeals [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/9/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1363 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/09/2026 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
