Eldridge v. Gutierrez, et al.
| CLINTON THOREDORE ELDRIDGE |
| GUTIERREZ, Warden, United States and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION |
| 26-1373 |
| March 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 12, DE 13 by Appellee Gutierrez are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 08/14/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 13 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Gutierrez. [Entered: 08/13/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Gutierrez. [Entered: 08/13/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Clinton Thoredore Eldridge. [Entered: 06/15/2026 05:32 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due August 17, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/05/2026 03:46 PM]
|
| Filing 9 MAIL RETURNED. DE 7 addressed to Appellant Clinton Thoredore Eldridge. Action taken: resending to FCI Butner Medium I, P.O. Box 1000, Butner, NC 27509. [Entered: 06/05/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Gutierrez. [Entered: 06/01/2026 10:46 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/17/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/11/2026 04:15 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Gutierrez. [Entered: 05/11/2026 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Clinton Thoredore Eldridge is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/13/2026 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Clinton Thoredore Eldridge. [Entered: 04/13/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Clinton Thoredore Eldridge. [Entered: 03/26/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/18/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/20/2026. For appeal no. 26-1373, 4:24-cv-00366-RCC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/09/2026 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:24-cv-00366-RCC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1373 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/09/2026 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
