Bell v. City of Redondo Beach
| JOHN BELL |
| CITY OF REDONDO BEACH |
| 26-1418 |
| March 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sarah Gerst [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 9 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Lisa Bond, representing Appellee City of Redondo Beach. [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Gerst for Appellee City of Redondo Beach. [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Thomas Peter Pierce. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): Yes [Lisa Bond]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Thomas Peter Pierce [Entered: 04/22/2026 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas Peter Pierce for Appellee City of Redondo Beach. [Entered: 04/22/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant John Bell is filed. [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant John Bell. [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/20/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/19/2026. For appeal no. 26-1418, 2:25-cv-09421-MCS-DSR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-09421-MCS-DSR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1418 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bell v. City of Redondo Beach | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN BELL | |
| Represented By: | John Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY OF REDONDO BEACH | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Bond |
| Represented By: | Sarah Gerst |
| Represented By: | Mr. Thomas Peter Pierce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
