Pessanha-Maule v. County of Pierce, et al.
Plaintiff: ENJOLI PESSANHA-MAULE, as Full Guardian and Conservator for Nathaniel Woods
Defendant: COUNTY OF PIERCE, Pierce County JOHN DOES 1-10 and NOUHOUM SIDIBE, in his individual capacity
Case Number: 26-1436
Filed: March 11, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The conference previously scheduled for April 8, 2026, is canceled. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. 11), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [Entered: 04/06/2026 01:57 PM]
April 3, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant County of Pierce, Appellant Nouhoum Sidibe. [Entered: 04/03/2026 11:00 AM]
March 26, 2026 Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Colleen Ann Libbey [Entered: 03/26/2026 12:26 PM]
March 26, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Colleen Ann Libbey for Appellee Enjoli Pessanha-Maule. [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:22 AM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee James Nathan Bingham [Entered: 03/25/2026 02:53 PM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Nathan Bingham for Appellee Enjoli Pessanha-Maule. [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:40 AM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 4/8/2026, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 03/19/2026 04:00 PM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Elizabeth Anne Dasse [Entered: 03/16/2026 11:48 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant County of Pierce, Appellant Nouhoum Sidibe. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/16/2026 09:19 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Anne Dasse for Appellant County of Pierce, Appellant Nouhoum Sidibe. [Entered: 03/16/2026 08:47 AM]
March 11, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/22/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/1/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/16/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/23/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/1/2026. For appeal no. 26-1436, 3:24-cv-05601-DGE. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/11/2026 11:51 AM]
March 11, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-05601-DGE has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1436 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/11/2026 11:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pessanha-Maule v. County of Pierce, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ENJOLI PESSANHA-MAULE, as Full Guardian and Conservator for Nathaniel Woods
Represented By: James T. Anderson
Represented By: Mrs. Colleen Ann Libbey
Represented By: James Nathan Bingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF PIERCE
Represented By: Peter John Helmberger
Represented By: Elizabeth Anne Dasse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pierce County JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NOUHOUM SIDIBE, in his individual capacity
Represented By: Peter John Helmberger
Represented By: Elizabeth Anne Dasse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?