Craig v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Plaintiff: DAVID CRAIG
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal entity
Case Number: 26-1487
Filed: March 12, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2026 Filing 12 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Gene Joseph Stonebarger [Entered: 04/07/2026 11:48 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 11 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/20/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/19/2026, Optional reply brief due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/07/2026 11:25 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gene Joseph Stonebarger for Appellant David Craig. [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:29 AM]
March 24, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. The portion of this courts March 12, 2026 docketing notice directing appellant to pay fees is vacated, subject to reconsideration by the panel assigned to the merits of this appeal. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address whether the fee provision of the Uniformed Services Employment & Reemployment Rights Act applies to the courts filing fees. See 38 U.S.C. 4323(h)(1) (No fees or court costs may be charged or taxed against any person claiming rights under this chapter.). [Entered: 03/24/2026 09:30 AM]
March 18, 2026 Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 4/7/2026, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 03/18/2026 02:53 PM]
March 18, 2026 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Kevin Wilson [Entered: 03/18/2026 01:08 PM]
March 18, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin Wilson for Appellant David Craig. [Entered: 03/18/2026 11:54 AM]
March 17, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant David Craig. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/17/2026 11:37 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 4 Attorney Kyle Ellis as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney John Snow. [Entered: 03/16/2026 02:05 PM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kyle Ellis for Appellee City of Los Angeles, Appellee Los Angeles Police Department replacing John Snow. [Entered: 03/16/2026 01:18 PM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/24/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/3/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/17/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/6/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/25/2026. For appeal no. 26-1487, 2:23-cv-06581-SVW-SSC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:06 PM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-06581-SVW-SSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1487 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/12/2026 01:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Craig v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID CRAIG
Represented By: Brian J. Lawler
Represented By: Mr. Kevin Wilson
Represented By: Mr. Gene Joseph Stonebarger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
Represented By: John Snow
Represented By: Mr. Kyle Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal entity
Represented By: Mr. Kyle Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?