Rodriguez-Rojas, et al. v. Blanche
Petitioner: ANDRES RODRIGUEZ-ROJAS, LINA PAOLA TRUJILLO-VARGAS and ANDRES SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ-TRUJILLO
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 26-1534
Filed: March 13, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to File Certified Administrative Record filed by Respondent Todd Blanche. [Entered: 04/23/2026 07:31 AM]
April 8, 2026 Filing 11 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:55 PM]
March 25, 2026 Filing 10 MAIL RETURNED. DE 6 addressed to Petitioners Andres Rodriguez-Rojas and Lina Paola Trujillo-Vargas. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 03/25/2026 03:28 PM]
March 23, 2026 Filing 9 DEFECTIVE---Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Petitioner Andres Rodriguez-Rojas, Petitioner Lina Paola Trujillo-Vargas, Petitioner Andres Santiago Rodriguez-Trujillo. [Filed under wrong filing type by accident, filed correctly in DE 10] [Entered: 03/23/2026 05:47 PM] [Edited: 03/25/2026 03:33 PM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Rebekah Nahas [Entered: 03/16/2026 09:54 AM]
March 16, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rebekah Nahas for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 03/16/2026 09:38 AM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 6 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 4/22/2026, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 5/13/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 6/1/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 7/1/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:52 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 5 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:47 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/13/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1534 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:46 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Andres Rodriguez-Rojas, Petitioner Andres Santiago Rodriguez-Trujillo, Petitioner Lina Paola Trujillo-Vargas. [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:44 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:44 PM]
March 13, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Andres Rodriguez-Rojas, Petitioner Andres Santiago Rodriguez-Trujillo, Petitioner Lina Paola Trujillo-Vargas. [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rodriguez-Rojas, et al. v. Blanche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANDRES RODRIGUEZ-ROJAS
Represented By: Andres Rodriguez-Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LINA PAOLA TRUJILLO-VARGAS
Represented By: Lina Paola Trujillo-Vargas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANDRES SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ-TRUJILLO
Represented By: Andres Santiago Rodriguez-Trujillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Rebekah Nahas
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Rebekah Nahas
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?