Higgins v. Marciopa County Defendants-Appellees, et al.
Plaintiff: MARK ROCK HIGGINS
Defendant: MARCIOPA COUNTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576, UNITED STATES DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576, GOODYEAR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576, MARK DANIELS, also named Mark Dannels, RANDY J. JUDD, also named Randy Jerome Judd, ANN A. SCOTT TIMMER, ROBERT BRUTINEL, also named Robert Maurice Brutinel, CHRIS NANOS, also named Christopher C Nanos and NON-APPEARING DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576
Case Number: 26-1576
Filed: March 19, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2026 Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to motion filed by Appellant Mark Rock Higgins. [Entered: 04/06/2026 02:23 PM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Mark Rock Higgins. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:17 PM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Mark Rock Higgins is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:16 PM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Mark Rock Higgins. [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:15 PM]
March 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. [Entered: 03/23/2026 01:55 PM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sean Mikel Moore [Entered: 03/19/2026 03:16 PM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sean Mikel Moore for Appellee Marciopa County Defendants-Appellees, No. 26-1576. [Entered: 03/19/2026 03:08 PM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/28/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/28/2026. For appeal no. 26-1576, 2:26-cv-00955-MTL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:04 AM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 2 Large Party Case Management Order. For court efficiency and administration, the court has decided to process this case as a Large Party Case. Parties that are represented by the same counsel or have no appearance are listed in one entry on the docket as follows and in the attachments to this order. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT]. [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:00 AM]
March 19, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-00955-MTL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1576 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/19/2026 10:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Higgins v. Marciopa County Defendants-Appellees, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK ROCK HIGGINS
Represented By: Mark Rock Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARCIOPA COUNTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576
Represented By: Sean Mikel Moore
Represented By: Evelyn Deanna Duenas
Represented By: Charles E. Trullinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576
Represented By: Mr. Emory Thomas Hurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GOODYEAR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576
Represented By: Larry Jay Crown
Represented By: Elan Shai Mizrahi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK DANIELS, also named Mark Dannels
Represented By: Michele Molinario
Represented By: Derek Ryan Graffious
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RANDY J. JUDD, also named Randy Jerome Judd
Represented By: Michele Molinario
Represented By: Derek Ryan Graffious
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANN A. SCOTT TIMMER
Represented By: Nancy Bonnell, ASATG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BRUTINEL, also named Robert Maurice Brutinel
Represented By: Nancy Bonnell, ASATG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRIS NANOS, also named Christopher C Nanos
Represented By: Tyler Joseph Campman
Represented By: Rebecca K. O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NON-APPEARING DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, NO. 26-1576
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?