United States of America v. Schaedler-Moore, et al.
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ROBERT MICHAEL BUZZ SHARRINGHAUSEN and ESTATE OF ROBERT MICHAEL SCHARRINGHAUSEN |
| NANCY SCHAEDLER-MOORE |
| 26-1659 |
| March 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Tax Suits |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 7) filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 22.] [Entered: 05/11/2026 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 05/11/2026 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 22 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 24.] [Entered: 05/11/2026 10:36 AM] [Edited: 05/11/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 05/08/2026 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 20 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings, Order, or Judgment (DE 10) filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 04/29/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Amend Case Caption (DE 6) filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 04/29/2026 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 18 District Court Order/Notice Received. Denying motion for stay pending appeal. [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 17 District Court Order/Notice Received. Denying motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Amend Case Caption (DE 6) filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 04/28/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 15 STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:36 AM] |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 13) filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 04/19/2026 09:10 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:37 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Expedite filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/27/2026 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/24/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend Case Caption filed by Appellant Nancy Schaedler-Moore. [Entered: 03/24/2026 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 Attorney Richard L. Parker as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Tijuhna Green. [Entered: 03/20/2026 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard L. Parker for Appellee United States of America replacing Tijuhna Green. [Entered: 03/20/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Richard Leo Fahey as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney David Greenberg. (Attorney David Greenberg entered at case opening in error) [Entered: 03/19/2026 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/28/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/28/2026. For appeal no. 26-1659, 3:03-cv-00551-W-MMP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/19/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:03-cv-00551-W-MMP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1659 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/19/2026 01:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
