Finander, et al. v. Riverside County Superior Court, et al.
| MARLENE R. FINANDER and BRIAN E. FINANDER |
| RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, a local entity, JASON B. GALKIN, individual capacity, JULIO JIMENEZ, and or his substitute and or successor and or replacement in his her individual and or official capacities, DOES, 3-100 and or his substitute and or successor and or replacement in his her individual and or official capacities and JOSE JIMENEZ, or his substitute or successor in his individual capacity |
| 26-1699 |
| March 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 22, 2026. The answering brief is due June 22, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:24 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Marlene R. Finander, Appellant Brian E. Finander. [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sarah Lee Overton [Entered: 03/23/2026 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Lee Overton for Appellee Jason B. Galkin, Appellee Riverside County Superior Court. [Entered: 03/23/2026 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/29/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/29/2026. For appeal no. 26-1699, 5:24-cv-01227-JVS-SSC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:24-cv-01227-JVS-SSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1699 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Finander, et al. v. Riverside County Superior Court, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARLENE R. FINANDER | |
| Represented By: | Marlene R. Finander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRIAN E. FINANDER | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Finander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, a local entity | |
| Represented By: | Paul Leonidas Lin |
| Represented By: | Sarah Lee Overton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JASON B. GALKIN, individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | Paul Leonidas Lin |
| Represented By: | Sarah Lee Overton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JULIO JIMENEZ, and or his substitute and or successor and or replacement in his her individual and or official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOES, 3-100 and or his substitute and or successor and or replacement in his her individual and or official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JOSE JIMENEZ, or his substitute or successor in his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
