Calderon v. Blanche
| LEISER MIGADEL CALDERON |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-1735 |
| March 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 10) is granted. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the certified administrative record (CAR) is granted. The CAR is due June 3, 2026. The response to the motion for a stay of removal is due June 24, 2026. The opening brief is due July 13, 2026. The answering brief is due August 12, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 05/11/2026 09:16 AM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Certified Administrative Record filed by Respondent Todd Blanche. [Entered: 05/01/2026 07:26 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Leiser Migadel Calderon. [Entered: 04/27/2026 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:43 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $600 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 03/30/2026 01:38 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Shahrzad Baghai [Entered: 03/24/2026 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shahrzad Baghai for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 03/24/2026 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 5/4/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 7/13/2026, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 5/26/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 6/11/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 03/23/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/23/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1735 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/23/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/23/2026 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Leiser Migadel Calderon. [Entered: 03/23/2026 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
