Vanaman v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tucson
| LESLIE GREY VANAMAN |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON |
| KATHERINE WERNER, PsyD, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist, JAMES HAYDEN, PsyD, Chief Psychologist, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden at USP Tucson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY, TUCSON, STATE OF WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF INDIANA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, D. COLBERT, Warden, JT SHARTLE, Warden, SUSAN MCCLENTOCK, Warden and UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Unknown BOP Staff |
| 26-1749 |
| March 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Marsha S. BERZON, Danielle J. FORREST) The district court has filed an order addressing petitioners first amended complaint. The petition for a writ of mandamus therefore is denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 09/10/2026 01:52 PM]
|
| Filing 9 District Court Order/Notice Received. Motion to Expedite is denied as moot. Defendants Hayden, Unknown Warden, United States, United States Department of Justice, United States Penitentiary-Tucson, Colbert, Shartle, McClentock, and Unknown BOP Staff are dismissed without prejudice. Counts Four, Five, Six, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, and Fourteen are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint, this Order, and summons forms for Defendants Werner and Bureau of Prisons. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order [Entered: 08/17/2026 07:58 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for reconsideration and reconsideration en banc is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10; 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.11. [Entered: 05/07/2026 04:00 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Reconsider Nondispositive Order filed by Petitioner Leslie Grey Vanaman. [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:53 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ The petition for a writ of mandamus is held in abeyance for 120 days to allow the district court to address the first amended complaint filed on September 25, 2025. The clerk will serve this order on the district court and District Judge Hinderaker. [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:38 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Leslie Grey Vanaman. [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Leslie Grey Vanaman. [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/20/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1749 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Leslie Grey Vanaman. [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
