Palma v. City of Mission Viejo, et al.
| WILLIAM HENRY PALMA |
| CITY OF MISSION VIEJO, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OSCD, Captain CHRISTOPHER J. MCDONALD, Arresting Deputy RYAN JAMES HANSEN, No. 10287, JAMES ROBERT WALKER, No. 11285, B. BURKA, No. 2280, LUKE SCHNEKENBURGER, DOES 1-10, Individuals, JOHN DOES 1-2, individuals who physically assaulted the Plaintiff during his preaching in the park, JOHN DOE 3, individual who made criminal threats toward the Plaintiff, attempting to incite violence, JANE DOE 1, The woman who called the police under false pretenses, JOHN DOES 4-5, Supervisors for OCSD failing to provide equal protection per governmental policy and JOHN DOE 6, OCSD Jail Failed to allow Plaintiff |
| 26-1759 |
| March 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ. The judgment of this Court, entered 4/24/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 05/18/2026 01:07 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the February 27, 2026 magistrate judge order is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Flam v. Flam, 788 F.3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015) (magistrate judge may hear and determine non-dispositive matters under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)); Estate of Bishop ex rel. Bishop v. Bechtel Power Corp., 905 F.2d 1272, 1274-75 (9th Cir. 1990) (order denying motion to remand to state court is not an appealable collateral order). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 08:07 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/2/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/4/2026. For appeal no. 26-1759, 8:24-cv-02116-JGB-SP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:24-cv-02116-JGB-SP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1759 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
