Sadorra v. Starlight Dunes HOA, et al.
| DENNIS D. SADORRA |
| STARLIGHT DUNES HOA, DESERT RESORT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIA, JAY BROWN, MARTIN BONAFEDE, MARK SUSSMAN, AMIR IBRIHIM, JERALD CAVARETTO, J. DAVID NICK, DELPHI LAW GROUP, LLP, HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP, KLINEDINST, PC, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO and DOES |
| 26-1791 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 06/26/2026 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 19 CLERK ACTION: Joint Answering Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 16, DE 17 by Appellees are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 06/26/2026 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellee Starlight Dunes HOA, Appellee Desert Resort Management Associa, Appellee Jay Brown, Appellee Martin Bonafede, Appellee Mark Sussman, Appellee Amir Ibrihim, Appellee Jerald Cavaretto. [Entered: 06/26/2026 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 17 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Starlight Dunes HOA, Appellee Desert Resort Management Associa, Appellee Jay Brown, Appellee Martin Bonafede, Appellee Mark Sussman, Appellee Amir Ibrihim, Appellee Jerald Cavaretto. [Entered: 06/26/2026 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Starlight Dunes HOA, Appellee Desert Resort Management Associa, Appellee Jay Brown, Appellee Martin Bonafede, Appellee Mark Sussman, Appellee Amir Ibrihim, Appellee Jerald Cavaretto. [Entered: 06/26/2026 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 15 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent money order number 55243354954 for $605.00 from Appellant to the USDC for receipting and docketing. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:25 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. The fees for this appeal are overdue. Within 21 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Appellants motion (Docket No. 8) for leave to file a late opposition is denied as unnecessary because no motion for summary affirmance has been filed in this docket No. 26-1791. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The clerk will serve Form 4 on appellant. [Entered: 06/05/2026 04:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/6/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/28/2026 01:21 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Starlight Dunes HOA, Appellee Desert Resort Management Associa, Appellee Jay Brown, Appellee Martin Bonafede, Appellee Mark Sussman, Appellee Amir Ibrihim, Appellee Jerald Cavaretto. [Entered: 05/28/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 9, DE 10 by Appellant Dennis D. Sadorra are filed. [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 10 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Dennis D. Sadorra. [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Dennis D. Sadorra. [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Dennis D. Sadorra. [Entered: 04/15/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Starlight Dunes HOA, Appellee Desert Resort Management Associa. [Entered: 04/08/2026 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Klinedinst, PC. [Entered: 04/07/2026 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Haight Brown & Bonesteel, LLP. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Delphi Law Group, LLP. [Entered: 04/07/2026 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/3/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/4/2026. For appeal no. 26-1791, 5:25-cv-02009-RGK-SP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:25-cv-02009-RGK-SP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1791 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
