Jackson v. Horn, et al.
| DERRICK JACKSON |
| PATWIN HORN, DAN MCCOURT, Plant Ops. Supervisor, ALVAREZ, Correctional Officer, FELIX, Correctional Officer and HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer |
| 26-1795 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not completed the authorization form and filed it with this court, as ordered by this court on April 7, 2026. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is therefore unnecessary. The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due June 12, 2026. There is no appearance by appellees, so briefing will be complete when the opening brief is filed. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:15 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Derrick Jackson. [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:13 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellant's prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect order.] [Entered: 04/07/2026 03:13 PM] [Edited: 05/13/2026 03:03 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/4/2026. For appeal no. 26-1795, 1:25-cv-01426-JLT-SAB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cv-01426-JLT-SAB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1795 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
