Dib, et al. v. Apple Inc.
| OTHMANE DIB, JESUS GUERRERO, LUCA DELA CRUZ, JEANETTE PORILLO, PETER GHANEM, RITA CRANE, NATHANIEL SANSOM, FRANK NUNEZ and RANY WARDA |
| APPLE INC. |
| ACADEMIC CARBON MARKET RESEARCHERS, AMICI IN NO. 26-1801, SIERRA CLUB, CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, CONSUMER WATCHDOG, AS YOU SOW and STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
| 26-1801 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 37 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 36) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due October 27, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 08/13/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 36 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 08/07/2026 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 35 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 34 by Amicus Curiae the State of California is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/29/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 34 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Amicus Curiae the State of California. [Entered: 07/29/2026 12:28 PM] |
Filing 33
ORDER FILED. The courts July 22, 2026, order at Docket Entry No. 25 is vacated. The State of Californias motion (Docket Entry No. 22) for an extension of time to file an amicus brief is granted. Any further amicus brief, including any amicus brief with a motion for leave to file an amicus brief if required by Fed. R. App. P. 29(a)(2), is due August 5, 2026. The answering brief is now due August 28, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 07/24/2026 02:02 PM]
|
| Filing 32 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 31 by Academic Carbon Market Researchers is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/24/2026 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 30 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 27 by As You Sow is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/23/2026 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 29 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 26 by Sierra Club, Center for International Environmental Law, Consumer Watchdog is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/23/2026 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 28 ADDED Amicus Curiae Academic Carbon Market Researchers, with counsel Daniel J. Cullenward; Amici Curiae Sierra Club, Center for International Environmental Law, and Consumer Watchdog, with counsel Andy Katz; Amicus Curiae As You Sow, with counsel Andy Katz and Danielle Fugere. [Entered: 07/23/2026 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 31 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Academic carbon market researchers.--[COURT UPDATE: Backdated entry to original file date] [Entered: 07/23/2026 08:42 PM] [Edited: 07/24/2026 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 27 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by As You Sow. [Entered: 07/22/2026 11:20 PM] |
| Filing 26 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Sierra Club, Center for International Environmental Law, Consumer Watchdog. [Entered: 07/22/2026 11:18 PM] |
|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 22) for an extension of time to file an amicus curiae brief is granted. Any motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is due August 5, 2026. The answering brief is now due August 28, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 07/22/2026 03:52 PM]
|
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE --- AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Academic carbon market researchers.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 31] [Entered: 07/22/2026 12:06 PM] [Edited: 07/24/2026 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 20, DE 21 by Appellants are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/16/2026 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 22 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Amicus Brief (DE 17) filed by Amicus Curiae - Pending State of California. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:52 PM] |
| Filing 21 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Othmane Dib, Appellant Jesus Guerrero, Appellant Luca Dela Cruz, Appellant Jeanette Porillo, Appellant Peter Ghanem, Appellant Rita Crane, Appellant Nathaniel Sansom, Appellant Frank Nunez, Appellant Rany Warda. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:29 PM] |
| Filing 20 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Othmane Dib, Appellant Jesus Guerrero, Appellant Luca Dela Cruz, Appellant Jeanette Porillo, Appellant Peter Ghanem, Appellant Rita Crane, Appellant Nathaniel Sansom, Appellant Frank Nunez, Appellant Rany Warda. [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:59 PM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file an amicus curiae brief is denied without prejudice to filing a renewed motion after the opening brief is filed. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 07/15/2026 09:28 AM]
|
| Filing 18 ADDED Amicus Curiae - Pending State of California, with counsel Adelina Acuna. [Entered: 07/10/2026 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Amicus Brief filed by Amicus Curiae the State of California. [Entered: 07/10/2026 12:01 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 15) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/15/2026, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/14/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/09/2026 08:20 AM]
|
| Filing 15 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Othmane Dib, Appellant Jesus Guerrero, Appellant Luca Dela Cruz, Appellant Jeanette Porillo, Appellant Peter Ghanem, Appellant Rita Crane, Appellant Nathaniel Sansom, Appellant Frank Nunez, Appellant Rany Warda. [Entered: 04/08/2026 08:35 PM] |
| Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 04/08/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 04/07/2026 09:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER: By 4/7/2026, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 04/01/2026 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Morgan Donoian MacBride [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Morgan Donoian MacBride for Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 04/01/2026 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Othmane Dib, Appellant Jesus Guerrero, Appellant Luca Dela Cruz, Appellant Jeanette Porillo, Appellant Peter Ghanem, Appellant Rita Crane, Appellant Nathaniel Sansom, Appellant Frank Nunez, Appellant Rany Warda. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 03/30/2026 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Laurel Zigerelli [Entered: 03/27/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Laurel Zigerelli for Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 03/27/2026 08:13 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Gregory Silbert, Counsel for Appellee Adam W. Mitchell [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Adam W. Mitchell for Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Singh for Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gregory Silbert for Appellee Apple Inc.. [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/30/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 5/6/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/15/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 4/6/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/15/2026. For appeal no. 26-1801, 5:25-cv-02043-NW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/25/2026 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:25-cv-02043-NW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1801 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/25/2026 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
