Emery v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al.
| ROBERT L. EMERY, JR. |
| OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (ODOC), an agency of the State of Oregon, OREGON CORRECTIONS ENTERPRISE, (OCE), An Agency of The State of Oregon;, Mr. CASTANON, OCE Production Manager, Mr. POPPELL, OCE Production Manager and LORI HENSEL, OCE General Manager |
| 26-1840 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION to File Supplemental Brief filed by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 13 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. (Appellant was sent a copy of the docket sheet on 5/5/26) [Entered: 05/15/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 12 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet in response to the request filed on 05/04/2026. [Entered: 05/05/2026 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. [Entered: 05/05/2026 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 10 CLERK ACTION: Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr. are filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 04/28/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr. is filed. Original and 6 copies. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. [Entered: 04/28/2026 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Robert L. Emery, Jr.. [Entered: 04/06/2026 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 04/06/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Robert A. Koch as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Catherine Mattecheck, Jason Brown. [Entered: 04/06/2026 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert A. Koch for Appellee Castanon, Appellee Lori Hensel, Appellee Oregon Corrections Enterprise, Appellee Oregon Department of Corrections, Appellee Poppell replacing Catherine Mattecheck, Jason Brown. [Entered: 04/06/2026 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/4/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/5/2026. For appeal no. 26-1840, 2:24-cv-01847-MC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01847-MC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1840 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
