Milner v. Dodd, et al.
| ERIK RANDALL MILNER |
| DUSTIN DODD, N.E.W.S, C.W.S., NICHOLAS TUSCANI, MATTHEW LIPSCOMB, MARTHA JIMENEZ RAMIREZ, NAPA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, NAPA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETE PIERSIG, JOSE VALASQUEZ, CITY OF NAPA, NAPA COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and ARIC BRIGHT |
| 26-1852 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Erik Randall Milner. [Entered: 05/14/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Erik Randall Milner. [Entered: 05/14/2026 02:11 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Proceedings in this court other than mediation are stayed until the district court rules on the timely tolling motions filed on March 9, 2026 and March 23, 2026. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). To challenge the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motions, appellant must file a timely notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and the district judge. [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:34 AM]
|
| Filing 9 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee John Kirby Salcedo, representing Appellee City of Napa, Appellee Dustin Dodd, Appellee Jose Valasquez, Appellee Matthew Lipscomb, Appellee Nicholas Tuscani, Appellee Pete Piersig. [Counsel not registered for e-filing, parties all have registered counsel.] [Entered: 04/17/2026 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Transcript Designation filed by Appellant Erik Randall Milner. [Entered: 04/09/2026 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee David Norton [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Norton for Appellee C.W.S., Appellee Martha Jimenez Ramirez. [Entered: 04/01/2026 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Erik Randall Milner. [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Erik Randall Milner. [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 3 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Erik Randall Milner. [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/15/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 5/6/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/15/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 4/6/2026. For appeal no. 26-1852, 3:25-cv-03350-JSC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-03350-JSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1852 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.