Harris v. Williams, et al.
| KALEB HARRIS |
| BRIAN WILLIAMS, JAMES SCALLY, JAMES DZURENDA, JULIE WILLIAMS and DANIEL GARCIA, named as CD Garcia |
| 26-1880 |
| March 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Lawrence VANDYKE, Jennifer SUNG The motion (Docket Entry No. 14) for appointment of pro bono counsel is denied. The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief is due October 28, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 09/16/2026 02:19 PM]
|
| Filing 15 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Kaleb Harris. [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Kaleb Harris. [Entered: 07/21/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Kaleb Harris is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 07/21/2026 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Kaleb Harris. [Entered: 07/21/2026 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 11 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 18, 2026. The answering brief is due October 19, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 07/10/2026 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Kaleb Harris. [Entered: 07/07/2026 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is now due July 20, 2026. The answering brief is due August 19, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/25/2026 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Kaleb Harris. [Entered: 06/04/2026 01:33 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Appellant Kaleb Harris, prison identification number 1203942, is proceeding in forma pauperis and has filed the form authorizing prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the district court the fees for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2). This court assesses an initial filing fee that equals 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to appellants prison trust account; or (B) the average monthly balance in appellants account for the six months preceding March 25, 2026, when the notice of appeal was filed. Payments will not be made when funds in the account total less than $10, but payments will resume when funds become available. The clerk will serve this order and the authorization form on the Attorney General for the State of NV who must notify the agency or prison authority responsible for administering payments for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Each payment should be accompanied by the district court and appeals court docket numbers for this case and a record of prior payments made for this appeal. The clerk will also serve a copy of this order on the district court clerk and the district court financial unit. [Entered: 04/29/2026 06:24 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant Kaleb Harris. [Entered: 04/23/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Chris Davis [Entered: 04/03/2026 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Chris Davis for Appellee Daniel Garcia. [Entered: 04/03/2026 08:00 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 03/30/2026 02:11 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/5/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/6/2026. For appeal no. 26-1880, 2:23-cv-01162-APG-MDC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/27/2026 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01162-APG-MDC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-1880 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/27/2026 01:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
