Zheng v. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, et al.
Plaintiff: MINJIE ZHENG
Defendant: INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS, BEIJING XINNET DIGITAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and VERISIGN, INC.
Case Number: 26-2020
Filed: April 2, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/20/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/22/2026 09:27 AM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 11 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee VeriSign, Inc.. [Entered: 05/21/2026 11:12 AM]
May 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Appellants opening brief at DE 8 was not filed by the due date of May 12, 2026. Appellant does not need to take any action to correct this as the court has accepted and filed the brief despite the deficiency. The remaining briefing schedule is reset as follows: appellees answering brief is now due on June 19, 2026; appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/20/2026 11:53 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Minjie Zheng is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/20/2026 11:49 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Minjie Zheng.--[COURT ENTERED FILING to replace DE 6] [Entered: 05/20/2026 11:42 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Minjie Zheng re: lateness of opening brief.--[COURT ENTERED FILING to replace DE 5] [Entered: 05/20/2026 11:41 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 6 DEFECTIVE --- JOINDER TO BRIEF filed by Appellant Minjie Zheng, joining [-].--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 8] [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:13 AM] [Edited: 05/20/2026 11:43 AM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 5 DEFECTIVE --- JOINDER TO BRIEF filed by Appellant Minjie Zheng, joining Situation description.pdf.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 7] [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:10 AM] [Edited: 05/20/2026 11:43 AM]
April 15, 2026 Filing 4 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 04/15/2026 04:37 PM]
April 14, 2026 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee VeriSign, Inc.. [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:17 PM]
April 2, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/11/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/12/2026. For appeal no. 26-2020, 2:25-cv-04808-SPG-AJR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/02/2026 02:01 PM]
April 2, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-04808-SPG-AJR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2020 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/02/2026 01:58 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Zheng v. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MINJIE ZHENG
Represented By: Minjie Zheng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS
Represented By: Kelly Marie Watne
Represented By: Mr. Jeff Levee
Represented By: Christine E. Cheung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEIJING XINNET DIGITAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VERISIGN, INC.
Represented By: Ronald Lee Johnston
Represented By: Mr. Oscar Daniel Ramallo
Represented By: Mr. James S. Blackburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?