Hernandez v. City of Chandler, et al.
| MARIO ALBERTO HERNANDEZ, for his two minor children L.H. and O.H. |
| CITY OF CHANDLER, CHANDLER MUNICIPAL COURT, CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT, MONICA K. LINDSTROM, HEATH HERNANDEZ, JOSHUA COHEN, ROSEMARY ROSALES, SAL HARO TRUJILLO, JACOB RAMER, JOSEPH PHELPS, ZACHARY THOMAS, BILLIE ENTRINGHAM, STATE OF ARIZONA, ANTOINETTE INGRAM, INGRAM, named as John Doe Ingram, husband, MIA A. INGRAM, JONELLE HARRIS, GEOFFREY WRESCHNER, MARIO URRUTIA, SEAN DUGGAN, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY and LEMONADE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 26-218 |
| January 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee City of Chandler, Appellee Chandler Municipal Court, Appellee Chandler Police Department, Appellee Heath Hernandez, Appellee Joshua Cohen, Appellee Rosemary Rosales, Appellee Sal Haro Trujillo, Appellee Jacob Ramer, Appellee Joseph Phelps, Appellee Zachary Thomas, Appellee Billie Entringham. [Entered: 07/07/2026 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellee State of Arizona. [Entered: 07/06/2026 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 28 MAIL RETURNED. DE 27 addressed to Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 06/29/2026 02:37 PM] |
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN The motion (Docket Entry No. 23) for injunctive relief is denied. See Feldman v. Ariz. Secy of State, 843 F.3d 366, 367 (9th Cir. 2016) (The standard for evaluating an injunction pending appeal is similar to that employed by district courts in deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction.); see also Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008) (defining standard for preliminary injunction in district court). The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief is due July 13, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 06/17/2026 01:29 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 25) granted. Amended briefing schedule FOR ALL APPELLEES: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/13/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/22/2026 12:42 PM]
|
| Filing 25 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee City of Chandler, Appellee Heath Hernandez, Appellee Joshua Cohen, Appellee Rosemary Rosales, Appellee Sal Haro Trujillo, Appellee Jacob Ramer, Appellee Joseph Phelps, Appellee Zachary Thomas, Appellee Billie Entringham. [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion for Injunctive Relief (DE 23) filed by Appellee State of Arizona. [Entered: 05/15/2026 02:43 PM] |
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The opening brief and excerpts of record have been filed. The answering brief is due June 12, 2026. The optional pro se reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 05/06/2026 01:54 PM]
|
| Filing 23 EMERGENCY MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellee Heath Hernandez. [Entered: 05/06/2026 08:51 PM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. [Entered: 04/01/2026 08:56 PM] |
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis lists Las Vegas, NV, as appellants city of residence. Appellant, however, has failed to provide this court with an updated address as required by Ninth Circuit Rule 46-3. Within 21 days appellant must provide an updated address . If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 03/16/2026 01:25 PM]
|
| Filing 19 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 03/04/2026 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 18 MAIL RETURNED. DE 4 addressed to Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. Action taken: resending to 555 E El Camino Real #109, Sunnyvale, CA 94087. [Entered: 02/27/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 17 Paper copy (1) of Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez received. [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copy (1) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez received. [Entered: 02/26/2026 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 15 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sean Mikel Moore [Entered: 02/24/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sean Mikel Moore for Appellee County of Maricopa. [Entered: 02/24/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 and Excerpts of Record at DE 12 by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez are filed. No paper copies are required. (Motion for IFP pending, briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 02/24/2026 08:45 AM] [Edited: 02/24/2026 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. [Entered: 02/24/2026 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. [Entered: 02/24/2026 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. [COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect correct party filer.] [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:17 AM] [Edited: 02/24/2026 08:50 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 24, 2026. The answering brief is due May 26, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant remains obligated to comply with the February 3, 2026 order. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will stay the briefing schedule. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 02/20/2026 10:32 AM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. [Entered: 02/17/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Daniel Patrick Schaack [Entered: 02/13/2026 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Patrick Schaack for Appellee State of Arizona. [Entered: 02/13/2026 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Mario Alberto Hernandez. Action taken: resending to 555 E El Camino Real #109, Sunnyvale, CA 94087. [Entered: 02/04/2026 01:26 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 3/3/2026 [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:35 PM]
|
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Mario Alberto Hernandez. [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/23/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/23/2026. For appeal no. 26-218, 2:23-cv-01400-SHD-JFM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/12/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01400-SHD-JFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-218 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/12/2026 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
