Tufano v. Google LLC, et al.
| FRANK TUFANO |
| GOOGLE LLC, ALPHABET INC., REALSELF, INC., MEHRYAR RAY TABAN and MEHRYAR TABAN MD, INC. |
| 26-2213 |
| April 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 18, 2026 order challenged in the notice of appeal is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:41 PM]
|
| Filing 12 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellee Google LLC, Appellee Alphabet Inc.. [Court entered filing to correct DE 11] [Entered: 05/20/2026 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellee Google LLC, Appellee Alphabet Inc.. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 12] [Entered: 05/20/2026 11:08 AM] [Edited: 05/20/2026 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Frank Tufano. [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Frank Tufano is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frank Tufano. [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Google LLC, Appellee Alphabet Inc.. [Entered: 04/23/2026 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ana Alicia Sontag for Appellee Alphabet Inc., Appellee Google LLC. [Entered: 04/23/2026 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Benjamin D. Margo for Appellee Alphabet Inc., Appellee Google LLC. [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Frank Tufano. [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Nicholas Evan Hakun, representing Appellee Alphabet Inc., Appellee Google LLC. [COURT UPDATE: Counsel is not registered for EFC filings.] [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/22/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/20/2026. For appeal no. 26-2213, 3:25-cv-10825-RFL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-10825-RFL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2213 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
