Carr, et al. v. Tewalt, et al.
| JODY CARR, DOES, Double Celled Close Custody Inmates of IDOC, RANDALL ERICKSON, RONALD BAKER, SHAWN PRUETT, CAMRON BELCHER, RICHARD ROA, CASEY FARLEY, RYAN CUNNINGHAM, MATTHEW KITRELL, JEREMY BROWN, MARK DIXON, NICHOLAS SHUFF, JOHN JONES, JR., DAVID PETERS, ATTORNEY, BRENT MESSINGER, JORDAN GOECKNER, OMAR PADILLA, JEREMY WILKINSON, ERIK JON PAYNE, ROBERT J. SAMS, DEREK SANDERS, CHRIS STEWART, ANDREW PEREZ, GUNNER WEIR, CODY WILLARD, IGNACIO AGUILAR, JR., KYLIE HODGES-FOOTE, SCOTT STONE, CHRISTOPHER HARDING, BERIN LAYMON, KYLE LASATER, DENNIS PETERSON, DANIEL J. MORGAN, JOSHUAH LINCOLN and JOHNOTHON L. MORRISON |
| Director IDOC JOSH TEWALT, CHAD PAGE, AMANDA GENTRY, JAY CHRISTENSEN, TIMOTHY MCKAY, TYLER NICODEMUS, Warden RICHARDSON, LT. GIBNEY, MARK KUBINSKI, DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL and RACHAEL ALTIG |
| 26-2328 |
| April 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary because briefing is stayed until resolution of appellant's motions (DE 3 & 7) to Proceed In forma Pauperis and for Appointment of Counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 06/09/2026 01:58 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Josh Tewalt, Appellee Chad Page, Appellee Amanda Gentry, Appellee Jay Christensen, Appellee Timothy McKay, Appellee Tyler Nicodemus, Appellee Richardson, Appellee LT. Gibney, Appellee Mark Kubinski, Appellee Rachael Altig. [Entered: 06/09/2026 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Jody Carr is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/13/2026 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Jody Carr. [Entered: 05/14/2026 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Jody Carr. [Entered: 05/13/2026 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Jody Carr. [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Jody Carr. [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/25/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/26/2026. For appeal no. 26-2328, 1:21-cv-00409-BLW-DKG. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/15/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:21-cv-00409-BLW-DKG has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2328 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/15/2026 02:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.