Walker v. Intelli-Heart Services, Inc., et al.
| TERRANCE WALKER, ex rel. United States; No further filings allowed in this closed case. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike all future filings pursuant to 272 Order |
| INTELLI-HEART SERVICES, INC., DANNY WEISBURG, VANNESSA PARSONS and DANIEL GERMAIN |
| 26-2424 |
| April 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - False Claims Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) granted FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellees) 7/29/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:07 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Daniel Germain. [Entered: 06/10/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Thomas D. Dillard [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas D. Dillard for Appellee Daniel Germain. [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant Terrance Walker. [Entered: 05/13/2026 02:28 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Terrance Walker is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/28/2026 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Terrance Walker. [Entered: 04/27/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Terrance Walker. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 04/20/2026 07:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/29/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/1/2026. For appeal no. 26-2424, 3:18-cv-00132-MMD-CLB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/20/2026 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:18-cv-00132-MMD-CLB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2424 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/20/2026 01:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
