United States of America v. Nickalaskey
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CHRISTOPHER JAMES NICKALASKEY |
| 26-2537 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CJA Counsel Appointment Counsel for Appellant Verna Jean Wefald Added. [Entered: 05/11/2026 02:30 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The court appoints counsel for appellant under the Criminal Justice Act. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. Within 14 days of identifying counsel, the appointing authority for the District of Alaska is requested to send counsels contact information to [email protected]. Counsel must order the transcript by June 5, 2026. The transcript is due July 6, 2026. The opening brief is due August 17, 2026. The answering brief is due September 16, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The clerk will serve this order on the district court and appellant individually. [Entered: 05/08/2026 03:57 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 168 MONTHS. Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/6/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/27/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/5/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/27/2026. For appeal no. 26-2537, 3:24-cr-00026-VMK-MMS-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 04/23/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cr-00026-VMK-MMS-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2537 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/23/2026 03:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Nickalaskey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Corso |
| Represented By: | Seth M. Beausang, Mr |
| Represented By: | Mac Caille Petursson |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Ivers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHRISTOPHER JAMES NICKALASKEY | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Verna Jean Wefald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
